![why do i not have a clr browser source plugin why do i not have a clr browser source plugin](https://dj7ev245wrwsrpcps1m4o1ac-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/AddingIntoOBS.png)
- #WHY DO I NOT HAVE A CLR BROWSER SOURCE PLUGIN INSTALL#
- #WHY DO I NOT HAVE A CLR BROWSER SOURCE PLUGIN DOWNLOAD#
Because Silverlight is intended to target a different set of scenarios from the desktop CLR, we were able to make some changes that simplified CoreCLR and allowed us to reduce the size of the Silverlight installation.
#WHY DO I NOT HAVE A CLR BROWSER SOURCE PLUGIN DOWNLOAD#
The two main design goals were size and compatibility: from a programmer's point of view, coding against the CLR should always be the same while from a user's point of view, the download needed to be very small. The design of CoreCLR began right after version 2.0 of the CLR shipped in October 2005. NET Framework 2.0 CLR-mscorwks.dll and mscorlib.dll-are each about the same size as the Silverlight 2 coreclr.dll and mscorlib.dll together.
![why do i not have a clr browser source plugin why do i not have a clr browser source plugin](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/DehiWqlppa8/hqdefault.jpg)
This is an amazing accomplishment when you consider that the two major core pieces of the.
#WHY DO I NOT HAVE A CLR BROWSER SOURCE PLUGIN INSTALL#
We were able to get the Beta 1 install down to 4.3MB-about 6 to 10 seconds to install over a broadband connection. In order for Silverlight to be successful with users, we had to make the installation fast. While it's good for developers to have a rich programming environment, users don't want to download big browser plug-ins. We created Silverlight 2 CoreCLR precisely to make Web programming as rich as desktop programming. Moreover, we didn't have to create a separate CoreCLR development environment: you can simply use Visual Studio® to design, develop, debug and profile C# or Visual Basic® the same way you would a desktop app. NET Framework skills that you use for desktop programming, such as the Base Class Libraries, XAML, and C#, and apply those skills directly to Web client applications. In contrast, Silverlight 2 allows you to take the same. Most of them are specific to the task of Web programming-skills learned while programming CSS aren't applicable in other domains. The past dozen or so years have given us many different Web programming technologies ranging from CSS to variants of ECMAScript. Here I will focus on the development core of Silverlight: CoreCLR. NET-compliant languages to program the Web client. One major change in Silverlight 2 is the ability to use Microsoft®. Silverlight™ 2 includes a number of changes in the Windows® Presentation Foundation (WPF) UI framework: new controls, rich networking APIs, and Digital Rights Management (DRM) support.